<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2008/04/10/477/</link>
	<description>love in the time of cultural studies</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Recording Surface :: Election grid :: April :: 2008</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2008/04/10/477/#comment-124085</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2008/04/10/477/#comment-124085</guid>
					<description>[...] As when Deleuze spoke these words thirty-one years ago, we seem to be in an interregnum. Deleuze was writing when, to use shorthand, Keynesianism was dead, killed by, more shorthand, May &amp;#8216;68, but it successor hadn&amp;#8217;t yet had its full birth. Today, the form of governmentality commonly called neoliberalism seems to be exhausted, eluded by strategic worldwide refusals and irretrievable even by declared states of emergency and permawar. Its heir is not exactly apparent just now, but the current global financial crisis might help produce the successor. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As when Deleuze spoke these words thirty-one years ago, we seem to be in an interregnum. Deleuze was writing when, to use shorthand, Keynesianism was dead, killed by, more shorthand, May &#8216;68, but it successor hadn&#8217;t yet had its full birth. Today, the form of governmentality commonly called neoliberalism seems to be exhausted, eluded by strategic worldwide refusals and irretrievable even by declared states of emergency and permawar. Its heir is not exactly apparent just now, but the current global financial crisis might help produce the successor. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
