not the motorcycle diaries

3/5/2008

I love the state and the state loves me

Filed under: travellin' lady, privi-legium — ana @ 3:49 pm

A journal entry I wrote from the Canadian Embassy in Quito, 19/12/2007:

I lost my bankcard (the second of two that I bought with me), and the Australian Embassy in Santiago is lending me 100 USD to see me straight until I get back to Mexico City. I am waiting for them to fax through the authorization to the Canadians. I find it quite amazing that the government is providing for me in this situation. I felt lucky to have whatever it is that seems to go along with being an Australian Citizen. I have thought a bit about the arrivant these past twenty four hours. Also about how my reliance on the state has something to do with wanting its indifference, its professionalism, the clear boundary between me and the system which means our relationship is instrumental. Refusal to rely on the state in this instance would mean investing myself in a web of relations that won’t end at the reception desk or my identity papers. I want that distance, the language of rights and citizenship - not the affective entwinements of community and mutual aid. Something in me prefers the uniforms and the paper shuffling to the indebtedness of the family or community bond, the requirement to talk about yourself, to feel grateful and reciprocal. I’ve never been sure if this is a personality problem of mine or if it is a recoded longing for another form of nonstate, nonsovereign community - one that retains certain disinvested features of certain relationships.

The state as unconditional gift? Surely not! But for me, today, with all the global privileges that have enabled me to escape physical crisis again, it has felt somewhat like that.

Don’t tell anybody.

(Of course, the state can be more like an unconditional gift (and less like one of towels and soap, in Az’s formulation) for people like me because I meet its condition in being an Anglo Australian of settler descent. I repaid the 100 USD by electronic transfer a few weeks ago. And that was it).

2 Comments »

  1. There is no unconditional gift – it would be a contradiction in terms.

    Comment by anonymauss — 3/5/2008 @ 4:05 pm

  2. What if it were anonymous, anonymauss? Very funny by the way.

    Comment by ana — 3/6/2008 @ 10:53 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress