<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiple Stories Told</title>
	<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/06/28/multiple-stories-told/</link>
	<description>love in the time of cultural studies</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ann</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/06/28/multiple-stories-told/#comment-680</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/06/28/multiple-stories-told/#comment-680</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I just had another thought about this. My concern is with treating reflexivity as an organisationalist concept, as this aligns it with the cognitive reflexivity of Giddens et al.  Lash and Urry allow me a departure point from this via the notion of aesthetic reflexivity, but tis still grounded essentially in their studies of industry, which methinks is where it is limited for my purposes.  I think it is actually larger/looser theoretical frameworks that are going to help me here (enter Foucault).
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had another thought about this. My concern is with treating reflexivity as an organisationalist concept, as this aligns it with the cognitive reflexivity of Giddens et al.  Lash and Urry allow me a departure point from this via the notion of aesthetic reflexivity, but tis still grounded essentially in their studies of industry, which methinks is where it is limited for my purposes.  I think it is actually larger/looser theoretical frameworks that are going to help me here (enter Foucault).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
