<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rottweiler of Christ</title>
	<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/04/20/the-rottweiler-of-christ/</link>
	<description>love in the time of cultural studies</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ann</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/04/20/the-rottweiler-of-christ/#comment-630</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 05:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/04/20/the-rottweiler-of-christ/#comment-630</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Some of your best friends indeed, it would seem, Adrian! ;-)
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of your best friends indeed, it would seem, Adrian! ;-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matrine</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/04/20/the-rottweiler-of-christ/#comment-629</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 01:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/04/20/the-rottweiler-of-christ/#comment-629</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;ahhh ann, looks like you weren't the only one with your money on Ratzinger: http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2005/s1349041.htm
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahhh ann, looks like you weren&#8217;t the only one with your money on Ratzinger: <a href='http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2005/s1349041.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2005/s1349041.htm</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/04/20/the-rottweiler-of-christ/#comment-628</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/04/20/the-rottweiler-of-christ/#comment-628</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Ehm, I hate to harp on about this, but once again I feel compelled to say it. If Eve hadn't tempted Adam, maybe we wouldn't be in this position. Things happen for a reason.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;And what's wrong with being an old, white, celibate male. Some of my best friends....
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehm, I hate to harp on about this, but once again I feel compelled to say it. If Eve hadn&#8217;t tempted Adam, maybe we wouldn&#8217;t be in this position. Things happen for a reason.</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s wrong with being an old, white, celibate male. Some of my best friends&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ann</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/04/20/the-rottweiler-of-christ/#comment-627</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 02:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/04/20/the-rottweiler-of-christ/#comment-627</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Twas a figure of speech.  Gambling is the devils game, mark ;-)
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twas a figure of speech.  Gambling is the devils game, mark ;-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mark</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/04/20/the-rottweiler-of-christ/#comment-626</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/04/20/the-rottweiler-of-christ/#comment-626</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Was your money really on him? If it was, you wouldn't have got very good odds: as with most general elections, the bookies proved far better than the pundits at picking this one. There was a guy on the radio only yesterday saying that there was no way that Ratzinger would get it because he'd pissed too money people off in his capacity as papal attack-dog.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was your money really on him? If it was, you wouldn&#8217;t have got very good odds: as with most general elections, the bookies proved far better than the pundits at picking this one. There was a guy on the radio only yesterday saying that there was no way that Ratzinger would get it because he&#8217;d pissed too money people off in his capacity as papal attack-dog.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
