<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: talking terms</title>
	<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/</link>
	<description>love in the time of cultural studies</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-612</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 04:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-612</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;you failed to say this was your 25th birthday - Mo-D
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you failed to say this was your 25th birthday - Mo-D
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: denim</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-609</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-609</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Bottles? :-)
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottles? :-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bottle Man</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-608</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-608</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Bottle man doesn't like pseudo-intellect.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Bottle man is from the 4th world.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Bottle man likes to talk in 3rd person..&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Bottle man has 2 more sentences to go including this one.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Bottle man has 1 thing on his mind. Guess?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottle man doesn&#8217;t like pseudo-intellect.</p>
<p>Bottle man is from the 4th world.</p>
<p>Bottle man likes to talk in 3rd person..</p>
<p>Bottle man has 2 more sentences to go including this one.</p>
<p>Bottle man has 1 thing on his mind. Guess?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ann</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-607</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-607</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;What about when people use spiritual or othersuch measures to define their own experience?
Does it always have to be at the cost of down-playing and justifying dire poverty?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about when people use spiritual or othersuch measures to define their own experience?<br />
Does it always have to be at the cost of down-playing and justifying dire poverty?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mark</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-606</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-606</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I have been wrestling with this problem for a while. You missed out the dependency theorists' 'centre/periphery' distinction, but then again I don't like this either. I like the poor/rich thing best actually - I think it's generally what Chomsky uses. I think adding the qualifier 'materially' is hideously twee, since 'poor' and 'rich' both have predominantly material connotations and the attempt to claim poor people are, say, 'spiritually rich' is both 1. hippie shit and 2. actually a justification for keeping them mired in (material) poverty.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been wrestling with this problem for a while. You missed out the dependency theorists&#8217; &#8216;centre/periphery&#8217; distinction, but then again I don&#8217;t like this either. I like the poor/rich thing best actually - I think it&#8217;s generally what Chomsky uses. I think adding the qualifier &#8216;materially&#8217; is hideously twee, since &#8216;poor&#8217; and &#8216;rich&#8217; both have predominantly material connotations and the attempt to claim poor people are, say, &#8217;spiritually rich&#8217; is both 1. hippie shit and 2. actually a justification for keeping them mired in (material) poverty.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ann</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-605</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-605</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;that's a v. useful article! cheeeers.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;the idea of using the word 'locales' is to get away from terms like 'country' which can mask the presence of elites et al .... to delineate the specificity of each location's conditions and allow more scope for people within those locations to define it for themselves ... does it have particular connotations?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s a v. useful article! cheeeers.</p>
<p>the idea of using the word &#8216;locales&#8217; is to get away from terms like &#8216;country&#8217; which can mask the presence of elites et al &#8230;. to delineate the specificity of each location&#8217;s conditions and allow more scope for people within those locations to define it for themselves &#8230; does it have particular connotations?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matrine</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-604</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-604</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;or go with the 'haves' and the 'have-nots' for it's Woman's Weekly-esque style. i reckon the word 'locales' is a bit too northern majority. 
there's a small article here on this issue http://www.sustainabletimes.ca/names.htm 
But it's Canadian.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or go with the &#8216;haves&#8217; and the &#8216;have-nots&#8217; for it&#8217;s Woman&#8217;s Weekly-esque style. i reckon the word &#8216;locales&#8217; is a bit too northern majority.<br />
there&#8217;s a small article here on this issue <a href='http://www.sustainabletimes.ca/names.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://www.sustainabletimes.ca/names.htm</a><br />
But it&#8217;s Canadian.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ann</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-603</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-603</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Heh.  I'd forgotten about north and south.  Had never quite understood it till now!&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;I had also forgotten about minority/majority world ... probably invented by New Internationalist, and probably the best one ...
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.  I&#8217;d forgotten about north and south.  Had never quite understood it till now!</p>
<p>I had also forgotten about minority/majority world &#8230; probably invented by New Internationalist, and probably the best one &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matrine</title>
		<link>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-601</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ana.people.vee.net/archives/2005/03/21/talking-terms/#comment-601</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;i reckon the 'north and south' one is the best one cos it displays:
a. clear lack of 'My First Atlas' as a child
b. a bitterness at living in a cold country and thus believing that people in warm countries are too busy sunbathing to develop economy, trade etc. 
c. the fact that it's not only applied to the whooole world, but to individual countries for added insanity/hilarity
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i reckon the &#8216;north and south&#8217; one is the best one cos it displays:<br />
a. clear lack of &#8216;My First Atlas&#8217; as a child<br />
b. a bitterness at living in a cold country and thus believing that people in warm countries are too busy sunbathing to develop economy, trade etc.<br />
c. the fact that it&#8217;s not only applied to the whooole world, but to individual countries for added insanity/hilarity
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
